<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Decisions in Bad Times: In Praise of Federation Community Allocations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boundlessdrama.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/good-decisions-in-bad-times-in-praise-of-federation-community-allocations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boundlessdrama.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/good-decisions-in-bad-times-in-praise-of-federation-community-allocations/</link>
	<description>Wondering where we are going as a Jewish community - one post at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:50:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://boundlessdrama.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/good-decisions-in-bad-times-in-praise-of-federation-community-allocations/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boundlessdrama.wordpress.com/?p=399#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Interesting take, Michael.  I think it may help to remember that as inclusive a process as allocations should be, there will be sensitive discussions about value judgments that should have some level of confidentiality.  And it&#039;s not inconceivable that an agency or two might (subtly) pack the room...

Perhaps a better approach is to consider that allocations is not a one-time event.  We must involve as many people as possible over time.  That way we develop a strong core of people who understand the values and the dynamic and can draw on their own experiences when assessing a given year&#039;s results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take, Michael.  I think it may help to remember that as inclusive a process as allocations should be, there will be sensitive discussions about value judgments that should have some level of confidentiality.  And it&#8217;s not inconceivable that an agency or two might (subtly) pack the room&#8230;</p>
<p>Perhaps a better approach is to consider that allocations is not a one-time event.  We must involve as many people as possible over time.  That way we develop a strong core of people who understand the values and the dynamic and can draw on their own experiences when assessing a given year&#8217;s results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://boundlessdrama.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/good-decisions-in-bad-times-in-praise-of-federation-community-allocations/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boundlessdrama.wordpress.com/?p=399#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure the allocations committee did great work and achieved excellent results. I just wish it wouldn&#039;t do its work behind closed doors. Federation acts as a pseudo-government for the Jewish community. Our donations are essentially volunteer, pay-as-means-allow taxes for the benefit of our community, and we trust Federation to allocate those donations/taxes fairly and wisely. That trust would be strengthened, and I suspect donations increased, if the allocations committee meetings were open to the public. If the Jewish press reported on the discussions leading to the difficult allocations decisions, people would have more faith in those decisions. They wouldn&#039;t have to take the word of allocations committee; they would know how decisions were made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the allocations committee did great work and achieved excellent results. I just wish it wouldn&#8217;t do its work behind closed doors. Federation acts as a pseudo-government for the Jewish community. Our donations are essentially volunteer, pay-as-means-allow taxes for the benefit of our community, and we trust Federation to allocate those donations/taxes fairly and wisely. That trust would be strengthened, and I suspect donations increased, if the allocations committee meetings were open to the public. If the Jewish press reported on the discussions leading to the difficult allocations decisions, people would have more faith in those decisions. They wouldn&#8217;t have to take the word of allocations committee; they would know how decisions were made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
